The Insidious Evil of Plain Tobacco Packaging Legislation

In one of the more odious pieces of legislation presented to the Australian Parliament in 2009, late last year Senator Fielding introduced a Private Members Bill entitled the Plain Tobacco Packaging (Removing Branding from Cigarette Packs) Bill 2009, a bill that seeks to amend product information standards regulations to strip brands trademarks, and logos from tobacco packaging (essentially you would only be allowed to have blank packs, with the name of the brand in small font at the bottom). It is a Bill that will do nothing to achieve its stated purpose, whilst simultaneously fundamentally attacking the very notion of property rights at the core of our economy, and violating numerous international treaties to which Australia is a party. As such, it is a Bill that should concern all on the Australian right.
Make no mistake: this Bill, the latest attempt by the anti-tobacco lobby to strip away at the small pleasures enjoyed by smokers in a quest to ultimately make the pastime illegal, is not about providing people with information about tobacco. This is not about allowing people to make an informed decision. Rather, this is about the fact that there is a powerful lobby group in Australia who have a pathological hatred of tobacco products, and want to impose their opinion to stop everyone from smoking. It is the latest salvo by the High Priests of the Cult of Health, the brigade of paternalism, the parents of the nanny state, to ensure that every drop of individualism is gradually squeezed from our lives. That any behavior that is even mildly outside what they deem ‘acceptable’ is outlawed. There is, after all, no evidence this Bill will achieve its stated objections of reducing smoking. Rather, by stripping away trademarks – a distinctly personal way of self-identification by smokers – it is simply an attack on those they deem ‘different’

However, my personal opinions about the motives behind this crusade aside, this Bill is problematic for a number of more serious reasons, primarily to do with the very damaging precedent it sets when it comes to intellectual property rights, and the fact that it flagrantly violates numerous international treaties that Australia has is party to.

There can be no doubt that, if enacted, the Bill would clearly violate the intellectual property rights of companies, through forbidding them from displaying their trademarks and thereby differentiating their products on the basis of said trademark.

Private property rights ought to be sacrosanct in any democratic country. The right to own and enjoy property is a fundamental part of rights of people, and indeed we consider it an extension of human rights. The protection of property, both physical and intellectual, is critical to economic development, and is the most important guarantee of freedom we have.

Obviously, the importance of protecting property rights is not limited to merely physical property, but intellectual property rights also, and there can be no doubt that the protection of trademarks is a vital part of protecting intellectual property rights. With Australia’s present restrictions on free specch in terms of prohibiting tobacco licensing, packaging is the critical way brand information can currently be provided to consumer. Aside from pricing, therefore, it is the essential mechanism through which tobacco manufacturers can compete with each other for consumers. Tobacco companies have created significant intellectual property rights through their trademarks, as demonstrated in the significant degree of ‘brand loyalty’ in the market, and that plain packaging legislation would significantly erode the value of these property rights.

By denying tobacco companies their right to use their trademark to identify their product, this Bill strikes at the very core principles of corporate identity and consumer information that the Australian economy is based upon. As such, it not only violates the legal rights of the companies affected, but furthermore sets a very dangerous principle for the future of a government unwilling to honour or respect intellectual property rights. And this doesn’t even begin to note how important trademarks are to prevent counterfeiting!

But this is not all. The Bill flagrantly is in breach of the Paris Convention, the WTO’s Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, the agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, and the Australia-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. For such a bill to be even considered by the Senate is simply mind-boggling.

I have written a submission on behalf of the Property Rights Alliance, an affiliate of Americans for Tax Reform, and publishers of the International Property Rights Index (Australia’s in 8th place by the way), going through the issues this bill presents in depth. I would strongly urge everyone interested in protecting international property rights, and opposing the nanny state, to have a read (click here to download). While  tobacco remains a legal product, the assault on the centuries-old protection of trademarks represents a very grave threat to the future of property rights, individual freedom, and freedom of speech, and as such, all of us on the right should be very scared indeed.

Because a future of bland cigarette packs is the perfect symbol for the future that big government advocates want: bland and plain. A future devoid of all danger, devoid of individuality, devoid of anything that makes life actually worth living. It is a future where we are all mindless automatons, marching in lockstep. With long, “healthy” lives, protected by the state from cradle to grave. Nurtured and subsidized, allowed to do no wrong. Existing, but not really living.

And it is a future that we on the right must fight with every fiber of our being, with every breath we have, until we can fight no more.

You can make a submission on this bill to the Senate Committee on Community Affairs until COB Friday.


6 Responses to “The Insidious Evil of Plain Tobacco Packaging Legislation”

  1. Ben Says:

    Great read.

  2. Lise Says:

    We’ve been “vaping” or using electronic cigarettes for almost two months now. We wouldn’t say they really taste like normal cigarettes – they taste better – nice flavours and not as harsh on the throat as normal cigarettes.

  3. Anne Says:

    Funny but not very original to read the tobacco-industry-speak myths opposing plain packaging of tobacco. The “small pleasures” you refer to are the leading cause of chronic disease clogging up our health care system and costs have risen from $12b to $31b a year since Ive been working in health. Since we cant afford the healthcare our ageing popualtion needs in the future what’s your plan? Plain or standardised packaging doesnt remove brand names and precedents already exist as many pharmaceutical products are sold in pharmacy in plain packaging and out of sight (and they dont kill people when used as intended).

  4. Kim Says:

    comments about the cost of smoking on the communityare most interesting. How can smoking in Australia cost $31bn when the UK who has 4 time the number of smokers reflect a cost of $10bn which is the equivalent of their tax. Again vested interest at play and a prejudice toward smokers and tobacco products. I do not argue that tobacco is not harmful but please be orginal and give us a balanced unbiased view that is not about vote collection and vote protection

  5. Jake the Muss Says:

    Anne the 31B figure you quote is not the cost to the taxpayer from smoking, it is a measure of total cost (including productivity losses and opportunity cost). I have problems with the methodology of the study however that very study states that the cost borne by the taxpayer through our health system is actually in the order of (and I’m being approximate as I can’t remember the exact figure) $250-350M per annum.

    As such you have either been misinformed/deceived or you are attempting to deceive.

    I would like you to give us your reaction to this information.

  6. alistair Says:

    We not only need plain packaging but price hikes singnage like only idiots smoke 1 in 2 people die from smoking whom smoke, ban on smoking outside buildings as I am sick of breathing those fumes at work. what is evil is the tobacco industry .This article is just a mouth piece for the tobacco industry why are they so upset nanny state my arse my wifes father is now dying from emphysema the last three years has been a strruggle for breath what a dreadfull way to

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: