Why I Feel Sympathy For John Della Bosca

I have very little love for John Della Bosca. A product of the Sussex Street machine, and a key player in one of the most incompetent governments in NSW history, there really is little I like about him. Having said that, however, I cannot help but feel some sympathy for him today as the media hyenas gleefully tear him to shreds.

I must note firstly however, that I can obviously only comment on what I have read, and so if people here have additional information that would affect my assessment, please let me know.

Having said this, there are two main issues I have over the treatment of Mr. Della Bosca. First and foremost is the behaviour of the woman involved. It is clear from the media reports that, following her termination of the affair, she voluntarily went to the media to provide them sordid details in all their glory. She provided journalists with intimate details, text messages, and character slurs on her former lover. Her motives were obviously not even remotely noble, and whether they be out of revenge, a desire for personal glory, financial or otherwise, they are clearly self-serving.

Through breaching the trust and privacy of Mr. Della Bosca in such a manner, whatever lasting shreds of doubt you could have had about her moral character evaporated. The fact that Mr. Della Bosca also broke vows is irrelevant in being able to objectively state that her actions in going to the media were morally reprehensible (and one suspects the possibility that Belinda Neale is far more pragmatic about such things to a degree that trust wasn’t actually broken). I am just sickened by this. This was a clear breech of trust that nothing in the story she presented is justified.John Della Bosca was betrayed in the cruelest way possible.

Secondly, I see no reason why having an affair should disqualify you from public office. None at all. We elect people in politics to govern. We do not elect them to be our moral leaders. Becoming an MP is not the same as becoming a priest. We do not – and should not – elect people on the basis of moral virtue. The only grounds for being elected or removed from office is your ability to do your job. And while I think Mr. Della Bosca should be thrown out of office, this is for the sole reason I think he is incapable in his job description. And not because of what he does in his private life.

Somewhere between 45-55% of married women and 50-60% of married men engage in extramarital sex at some time or another during their marriage. This is a horrible, horrible statistic, and one that is very, very saddening, but it remains a reality. So many people have fallen, and yet we expect our politicians to be pure? Particularly in the political sphere where you have high levels of stress combined with the necessity of travel and spending long periods of time away from home. We really expect our politicians to be as pure as the virgin snow? We really demand such standards – standards we can not keep ourselves? And we’re okay with such hypocrisy?

I do not seek to excuse affairs, not in the slightest. It is an appalling tragedy for the family, and certainly is a moral stain on the character of who committed it. For that I condemn it wholeheartedly. However, with that in mind, I find it a disturbing trend in society at the moment that we expect our politicians to live lives free of sin. To be models of purity and virtue. To be angelic role models in their private lives. And if they ever show any signs of frail humanity and weakness, we tear them down. Such an attitude of unrealistic expectations can never be good for government. We either end up with unrepresentative puritans, or persons who are forced to lie and conceal themselves from the public – what sort of an incentive for honesty is there? And then blackmail becomes an active political commodity. More dangerously, fostering such a mentality that politicians are almost super-human beings means we trust them ,and government ,with far too much power. A society where politicians are ‘role models’ is a dangerous society for liberty indeed.

The only other issue here I wish to make brief not on is how the media act as gatekeepers to decide what ‘scandal’ makes the public. Salacious activities, affairs, these all happen regularly in politics. Any night you can find an activity that presently would be teemed ‘career ending’ if it was made public. And we have a media that has set itself up in the role of judge, jury and executioner in deciding when to go public, when to hush things up. What careers to destroy, and what to save. Whether arbitrary or with a purpose in mind, there can be little doubt the media manipulate such things to get the story they want. And democracy is all the worse for it.

It would be better for all concerned if we understood and accepted our politicians as humans, with all their flaws. We removed the pedestal from under them, and accepted them for who they were. We did not rip into our opponents for personal failings, but rather focused on the issues at hand. And, as technologies are destroying traditional information model, I have hope that such things will gradually occur.

Update: Best Tweat To Date – @moreoj personally I’d prefer a competent premier who’s fucking around than a fucking incompetent premier

Update 2: On the issue of the morality of what was effectively an act of character assassination by the woman in question, I reminded by a Catholic Colleague of mine that such an act would easily be considered a mortal sin by the Catholic Church as gossip that is aimed at destroying someones character/work etc is effectively murder. In fact, the homily at my church yesterday discussed what murder really is in the context of the 10 Commandments from an Orthodox perspective, and how if we kill someone’s reputation, we are in effect killing them.

To those of us who hold Christian beliefs and are involved in politics, I think it is something we would do well to remember. Every time we attack someone behind their back, every time we post an anonymous blog comment, every time we try to kill someone’s reputation, we are, from God’s perspective, killing them.

Tags: , , ,

8 Responses to “Why I Feel Sympathy For John Della Bosca”

  1. Alex Says:

    Okay Tim, I totally agree with you re the weight we give to personal scandals in politics. They are there to do their job and should not be pressured to resign for an incident completely separate from their responsibilities to the state. Della Bosca was stupid to cheat on his wife especially when his career relies upon public opinion and public support in a country such as Australia where adultery is frowned upon. I have no sympathies for him however he should not lose his job over the matter. It was his decision to resign though, legally I’m sure his dismissal would not be legitimate. After all Bill Clinton (slightly more powerful than Della Bosca) did not lose his job after it was revealed he also had an affair, he remained one of the most powerful man in the world and his wife now is one of the most powerful women. It makes me wonder, is there something more behind this affair? Is it more than just a casual affair?

    Oh well, We are better off without him though, and I’m sure the Labor party is thinking the same, they would struggle to deal with yet another issue in the face of the upcoming elections (which they are already almost certain to lose).

  2. Alex Says:

    Actually after learning more on the matter and how the affair contributed to the neglect of his ministerial duties I understand the calls for his resignation. The affair influenced his performance as an MP and for that he should lose his job.

  3. Mike Honcho Says:

    The reason that having affairs matters when it comes to our political leaders is for three reasons:

    1) As leaders, they set an example for others to follow. Condoning politicians cheating on their partners undermines general moral standards;

    2) A leader who can’t keep it in their pants lacks the discipline necessary to do their job; and

    3) A cheating politician shows extreme disloyalty to his own family. if they are that ready to turn on their flesh and blood, then what chance does the ordinary punter who elected them have?

    And one survey that says 55% of spouse cheat means nothing. I am sure i can find you a survey that says 99% of lesbian vegetarians eat spinach too.

    Unless they can verify those claims, they are nothing but conjecture. And anecdotally anyway, it just doesn’t sound right.

  4. The Moral Fiber of the Politician « Questing for Atlantis Says:

    […] Moral Fiber of the Politician 1 09 2009 My friend Tim wrote up an interesting set of thoughts on a recent scandal in Australian politics. I have no idea who any of the players are or the implications thereof, but he raises a point that […]

  5. Dee Says:

    The best and most measured thing I’ve read on this ‘affair’ so far… Thanks.

  6. Martin Andres Says:

    The name of the vixen!!! The vixen names!!!!

    A millon times !!!! The vixen names!!!!

  7. bojan Says:

    Hi all,

    Does anyone here wonder whether there was more to the story that was avoided publication through his resignation? I find it incredible that the affair alone – without other things like the misuse of public money – would cause such a quick resignation.

  8. My Blog: One Year On « The musings of an Australian classical liberal in Washington DC Says:

    […] Why I feel sympathy for John Della Bosca Why Turnbull MUST Be Deposed (I bury the hatchet into Turnbull) […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: