Australian Government to Censor Pro-Life Website

As I have long argued, we are starting to see proof emerge that the Australian Government’s attempt to censor the internet under the guise of ‘think of the children’ will rapidly degenerate into attacks on freedom of expression and dissenting views.

I was recently forwarded this article from Crikey‘s newsletter. It lays out how a pro-life website has just been added to the secret ‘prohibited content’ list already in play, and how if this legislation will be passed, this website will be censored out of existence in Australia. The article seems to check out, and, if true, is a very, very worrying portent of things to come.

You should be able to read the article free at Crikey, I can’t seem to access it at the moment, so for now I shall quote it in full.

“Freedom of speech is fundamentally important in a democratic society and there has never been any suggestion that the Australian Government would seek to block political content,” intoned Senator Stephen Conroy on Tuesday.

Yet the very next day, ACMA added a page from what’s arguably a political website to its secret blacklist of Internet nasties.

The page is part of an anti-abortion website which claims to include “everything schools, government, and abortion clinics are afraid to tell or show you”. Yes, photos of dismembered fetuses designed to scare women out of having an abortion. Before you click through, be warned: it is confronting. Here‘s the blacklisted page.

Mandatory Internet filtering, says Senator Conroy, is only about blocking the ACMA blacklist. The blacklist, he repeatedly insists, is “mainly” child-abuse and ultra-violent material. He’s protecting us from ped-philes, stopping terrorists, that sort of thing. It’s like the regulation we have for TV, films and books. Except it’s not. It’s not even close.

As always, Irene Graham’s meticulously-researched explains how Internet censorship actually works now and what the Rudd government has been planning.

This pro-life nasty may not be suitable for children. You may or may not agree with the website creators’ political views or their tactics. However, it does represent their sincere political beliefs and, no doubt, derives from their strong moral beliefs. It’s perfectly legal material for adults to view. These pictures could be shown on TV news, just like the all-too-frequent photos of war casualties, provided we were warned “some viewers may find these images disturbing”. You can decide for yourself whether to avert your eyes or hustle the kids out of the living room.

Because it’s The Big Bad Internet, though, things are different.

This content is hosted outside Australia, outside ACMA’s jurisdiction, so they can’t demand it be taken down or guarded by an age-verification mechanism. They can only add it to the blacklist — and under Conroy’s plan, everything on the blacklist is blocked, secretly, for all Australians. No choice.

“The Government does not view this debate as an argument about freedom of speech,” says Senator Conroy.

But that’s precisely what it is. Internet filtering is about what information may or may not flow through the public internet. This case highlights some of the flaws in the Rudd government’s plan.

Just where does political speech begin and end? Scholars and judges have wrestled with the boundaries of political speech for centuries, from John Milton to Alexander Meikeljohn. Has the Rudd government suddenly found the magic answer?

Peter Black, who lectures in internet law at QUT, reckons it’s probable this website does indeed constitute prohibited content or potential prohibited content under the Broadcasting Services Act.

But that is only because the definitions in the Act inevitably treat all content in the same way; the same standard applies to political and non-political content,” he says.

“Ultimately the fate of this website is an illustrative example of the dangers inherent in any Government censorship scheme. Issues of political speech, classification and accountability are without doubt both complex and important, and any notion that they can be adequately addressed and balanced by a Government regulator engaging in prior restraint is somewhere between being unbelievably naive and downright dangerous.”


8 Responses to “Australian Government to Censor Pro-Life Website”

  1. Nicholas Tam Says:

    If this actually happens I would suggest that it would be subject to a constitutional challenge predicated upon the implied freedom of political communication.

  2. websinthe Says:

    Fortunately the Australian wowser community has far less sway over the courts that generate the common law supporting that implied freedom than they do over the government that is desperately trying to destroy it.

  3. Australian Prime Minister calls for New UberKeynsian World Order « The musings of an Australian classical liberal in Washington DC Says:

    […] began by regulating what we drink. Then censoring what we read. He is forcing us to join unions. And now, it would seem, a new world socialist order is his […]

  4. WikiLeaks on Censorship Blacklist « The musings of an Australian classical liberal in Washington DC Says:

    […] not include political content have rapidly become farcical. Not only has it been discovered that anti-abortion websites make the blacklist, but it has just been revealed that WikiLeaks – the whistle blower […]

  5. Morgan P Dreys Says:

    Nice looking website!

  6. Tavish Says:

    If my mom is charged for a major crime is it required that they seek legal consultation ?

  7. Jayesh Says:

    Zack Snyder’s done a fantastic job with the movie Watchmen. Very different concept all together. 6 legendary superheroes fighting crime in alternate 1985 America. Check out their facebook page

  8. Edmund Mackowiak Says:

    Exactly, what i was searching for. THX

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: